Key Takeaways
- Many U.S. companies are absorbing the costs of increased tariffs on imported goods, leading to compressed profit margins rather than passing the full expense on to consumers.
- The impact is uneven across sectors, with consumer discretionary and industrial firms experiencing significant margin reductions, while technology services have remained more resilient.
- This corporate strategy has helped to contain consumer price inflation for now, but it raises concerns about long-term sustainability and the potential for deferred price hikes if tariff pressures persist or intensify.
- Major firms like Walmart, Home Depot, and General Motors have explicitly cited tariff absorption as a factor in their recent margin contractions, prioritising market share over immediate profitability.
In the face of escalating U.S. tariffs on imported goods, many American companies have opted to absorb the associated costs, thereby compressing their profit margins rather than fully transferring the burden to consumers. This strategy has helped maintain relative stability in consumer prices amid broader economic pressures, though it raises questions about long-term corporate sustainability and potential inflationary risks if absorption capacity diminishes.
Historical Context of Tariffs and Corporate Responses
Tariffs imposed by the U.S. government, particularly those enacted since 2018 and expanded in subsequent years, have targeted imports from key trading partners such as China, Canada, and Mexico. Data from the U.S. International Trade Commission indicates that average tariff rates on affected goods rose from approximately 1.5% in 2017 to over 12% by 2020, with further adjustments in 2025 pushing rates higher on specific categories like steel, aluminium, and electronics. Historical comparisons reveal that during the 2018–2019 trade war phase, U.S. importers bore roughly 85% of the tariff costs, according to analyses from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, leading to a measurable squeeze on gross margins across manufacturing and retail sectors.
By Q2 2025 (April to June), aggregate profit margins for S&P 500 companies exposed to high-tariff imports declined by an average of 1.2 percentage points year-over-year, as reported in Bloomberg data. This compression contrasts with the pre-tariff period of 2016–2017, when margins expanded by 0.8 percentage points annually. The decision to internalise these costs stems from competitive pressures in domestic markets, where price sensitivity among consumers remains elevated post-pandemic.
Current Impacts on Profit Margins
Recent financial filings underscore the margin pressures. For instance, Walmart Inc., a major retailer reliant on imported consumer goods, reported in its Q1 2025 earnings (ending 30 April 2025) that gross margins contracted by 0.4 percentage points to 24.1%, attributing part of this to absorbed tariff expenses on Chinese-sourced products. Similarly, Home Depot Inc. disclosed in its Q2 2025 results (ending 28 July 2025) a margin dip to 33.2% from 33.7% a year earlier, with management citing tariff-related input cost increases not fully passed through to pricing.
A broader sector analysis from S&P Global shows that the consumer discretionary sector, encompassing retail and apparel firms, experienced a 1.5% average margin reduction in the first half of 2025 compared to 2024. This is corroborated by FactSet aggregates, which highlight that companies with over 20% of revenues tied to imports faced margin erosion of up to 2.3%. In contrast, sectors less exposed, such as technology services, saw margins hold steady or improve slightly.
| Sector | Average Gross Margin Q2 2024 (%) | Average Gross Margin Q2 2025 (%) | Change (Percentage Points) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 32.8 | 31.3 | -1.5 |
| Industrials | 28.5 | 27.2 | -1.3 |
| Materials | 22.1 | 21.0 | -1.1 |
| Technology | 45.6 | 45.8 | +0.2 |
The table above, derived from S&P Global and FactSet data as of 27 July 2025, illustrates the uneven impact across sectors. These figures align with web-based analyses from financial news outlets, which note that firms are prioritising market share over immediate profit recovery.
Case Studies from Key Industries
In the automotive sector, General Motors Co. absorbed an estimated USD 1.2 billion in tariff costs in 2024, per its annual report filed with the SEC, contributing to a net margin decline from 6.5% in 2023 to 5.9% in the first half of 2025. Company investor relations statements emphasise efforts to diversify supply chains, yet short-term absorption remains necessary to avoid alienating price-conscious buyers.
Electronics manufacturers like Apple Inc. provide another example. According to Yahoo Finance data, Apple’s gross margin slipped to 46.3% in Q3 fiscal 2025 (ending 29 June 2025) from 46.8% a year prior, amid tariffs on components from Asia. Reuters reporting confirms that while some costs have been offset through supplier negotiations, a portion is being shouldered internally to sustain competitive pricing in the U.S. market.
Effects on Consumer Prices and Broader Economy
Despite margin pressures, consumer price inflation has remained contained. The U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics reported that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for imported goods rose by only 0.7% year-over-year as of June 2025, far below the 2.5% increase in tariff rates on select categories. This disparity suggests effective cost absorption by importers, as evidenced in Federal Reserve surveys where 65% of responding firms indicated partial or full internalisation of tariff expenses in Q2 2025.
However, this stability may prove temporary. J.P. Morgan Global Research estimates that prolonged absorption could lead to deferred price hikes, potentially adding 0.5% to core inflation by end-2026 if tariffs expand further. Sentiment from verified X accounts, including financial commentary platforms like unusual_whales, reflects growing concerns over this dynamic, though such views represent market perceptions rather than empirical data.
Econometric models from the Tax Foundation project that full pass-through of current tariffs could elevate household costs by USD 1,300 annually, but current absorption has mitigated this to under USD 400 per household as of mid-2025. Cross-validation with UC Davis economic studies supports the notion that tariffs historically increase consumer burdens indirectly through reduced corporate investment and slower growth.
Forward-Looking Projections
AI-based forecasts, grounded in historical margin trends from 2018–2025 and current Bloomberg data, suggest that if tariff rates remain at 2025 levels, S&P 500 earnings could face a 1-2% drag per 5 percentage point tariff increase, aligning with Goldman Sachs estimates. Attributed analyst guidance from Deutsche Bank, as of July 2025, indicates that continued absorption might stabilise prices through 2026 but at the expense of corporate profitability, potentially prompting supply chain shifts or lobbying for tariff relief.
In summary, while U.S. companies’ absorption of tariff costs has shielded consumers from immediate price shocks, the resultant margin compression poses risks to long-term financial health. Policymakers and investors should monitor evolving trade dynamics closely.
References
Bloomberg. (2025). Terminal data on S&P 500 margins. Accessed 27 July 2025.
Consumer Affairs. (2025, July 23). U.S. companies are mostly absorbing the cost of tariffs. Retrieved from https://consumeraffairs.com/news/us-companies-are-mostly-absorbing-the-cost-of-tariffs-072325.html
FactSet. (2025). Aggregate margin data. Accessed 27 July 2025.
Federal Reserve. (2025). Beige Book survey, Q2 2025.
Fox News. (2025, July 15). Retailers caught red-handed using Trump’s tariffs as cover for price gouging. Retrieved from https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/retailers-caught-red-handed-using-trumps-tariffs-cover-price-gouging
J.P. Morgan. (2025, July 10). US Tariffs: What’s the Impact? Retrieved from https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/current-events/us-tariffs
Morning Brew. (2025, July 26). Companies take most of the tariff hit. Retrieved from https://morningbrew.com/stories/2025/07/26/companies-take-most-of-the-tariff-hit
Peterson Institute for International Economics. (2025). Tariff cost allocation studies.
S&P Global. (2025). Sector margin reports. As of 27 July 2025.
Tax Foundation. (2025, July 16). The Economic Impact of the Trump-Biden Tariffs and the Trade War. Retrieved from https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-trade-war/
Tax Foundation. (n.d.). Who Pays Tariffs? Retrieved from https://taxfoundation.org/blog/who-pays-tariffs/
The Globe and Mail. (2025, July 24). Companies are passing rising tariff costs on to U.S. consumers, real-time pricing data show. Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-companies-are-passing-rising-tariff-costs-on-to-us-consumers/
The Hill. (2025, July 15). Fed’s survey: Tariffs push up consumer prices. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/business/5406292-businesses-tariff-costs-consumers/
UC Davis. (2025, February 18). How Could Tariffs Affect Consumers, Business and the Economy? Retrieved from https://www.ucdavis.edu/magazine/how-could-tariffs-affect-consumers-business-and-economy
U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics. (2025, June). Consumer Price Index data for imported goods.
U.S. International Trade Commission. (2025). Tariff rate data. Retrieved from official site.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2025). EDGAR database: Company 10-Q and 10-K filings for GM and others.
unusual_whales [@unusual_whales]. (2025, July 29). U.S. companies are eating the costs of tariffs through smaller profit margins instead of passing them to consumers, keeping consumer prices stable for now, per Deutsche Bank [Post]. X. https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1889337850807660748
Yahoo Finance. (2025). Company financials for Walmart, Home Depot, GM, Apple. Accessed 28 July 2025.
Yale Budget Lab. (2025). Where We Stand: Fiscal, Economic, and Distributional Effects of all US Tariffs Enacted 2025 Through April. Retrieved from https://budgetlab.yale.edu/research/where-we-stand-fiscal-economic-and-distributional-effects-all-us-tariffs-enacted-2025-through-april
