US embeds trackers in chip shipments to curb China diversions, pressuring Nvidia ($NVDA) and AMD through 2026

Escalating tensions in the US-China technology rivalry have once again spotlighted the intricate dance of export controls, surveillance tactics, and accusations of overreach, with recent reports highlighting claims that American authorities have embedded tracking devices in shipments of advanced semiconductors. This development underscores the deepening mistrust between the two superpowers, potentially reshaping supply chains and investment landscapes in the global chip industry.

The Core of the Dispute: Trackers in Chip Shipments

At the heart of the latest friction lies allegations that US officials have surreptitiously placed location-tracking devices within select consignments of high-end chips, aimed at preventing their illicit redirection to restricted destinations. Such measures, reportedly targeting shipments involving components from leading firms like Nvidia and AMD, reflect a broader strategy to enforce stringent export curbs imposed over recent years. These restrictions, tightened progressively since 2019, seek to limit China’s access to cutting-edge technology amid concerns over national security and technological supremacy.

The practice, if confirmed, illustrates the lengths to which governments are going to police global trade in semiconductors—a sector valued at over $500 billion annually as of 2023 figures from the Semiconductor Industry Association. By embedding trackers in packaging or even within server hardware from companies such as Dell and Super Micro Computer, authorities aim to monitor diversions in real-time, potentially leading to enforcement actions against violators. This tactic, while innovative, has drawn sharp rebukes from Beijing, framing it as emblematic of broader surveillance ambitions.

Geopolitical Backdrop and Historical Context

To appreciate the significance, one must consider the historical arc of US-China tech relations. Export controls on advanced chips trace back to the Trump administration’s 2018 measures against entities like Huawei, expanding under subsequent policies to encompass artificial intelligence and quantum computing technologies. By 2022, the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security had blacklisted numerous Chinese firms, prohibiting exports without licences that are rarely granted.

These curbs have not been without pushback. China has retaliated with its own restrictions on rare earth minerals and investigations into US companies, creating a tit-for-tat dynamic that has inflated costs and disrupted global supply chains. For instance, a 2023 World Trade Organization report noted that such trade barriers contributed to a 5% slowdown in semiconductor trade volumes between major economies. Investors in the sector have had to navigate this volatility, with firms like TSMC relocating production to mitigate risks—evidenced by its $12 billion Arizona fab announced in 2020.

Implications for Global Chipmakers

For companies entangled in this web, the revelations carry profound implications. Nvidia, a dominant player in AI accelerators, reported in its fiscal 2024 earnings that China accounted for roughly 20% of its data centre revenue prior to intensified restrictions, a figure that has since dwindled. Analysts from firms like Bernstein project that ongoing curbs could shave 5-10% off Nvidia’s annual growth trajectory through 2026, assuming no easing of tensions.

Similarly, AMD has felt the pinch, with its high-performance computing chips facing export hurdles. A model-based forecast from Goldman Sachs, dated 2024, estimates that without access to the Chinese market, AMD’s revenue could underperform by up to 15% in scenarios of prolonged decoupling. Dell and Super Micro, as system integrators, face indirect pressures; any association with tracked shipments could erode trust among international clients, prompting a shift towards diversified suppliers.

• Supply Chain Reconfigurations: Firms are accelerating efforts to “friendshore” production, with investments in Southeast Asia and India surging by 30% year-on-year as per 2024 UNCTAD data.
• Valuation Impacts: Historical precedents, such as the 2019 Huawei ban, saw affected stocks dip by an average of 8% in the ensuing quarter, according to Bloomberg analysis.
• Risk Premiums: Geopolitical uncertainty has baked in a 2-3% risk premium to sector valuations, per JPMorgan’s 2025 outlook.

Yet, there’s a dry irony here: while the US decries Chinese surveillance in products like TikTok or Huawei gear—leading to bans in several Western nations—its own methods now invite mirror-image accusations. This symmetry might amuse detached observers, but for investors, it signals heightened volatility and the need for robust scenario planning.

Investor Sentiment and Market Reactions

Sentiment among Wall Street analysts remains cautiously bearish on US-exposed chip stocks amid these developments. A consensus from Morningstar, as of mid-2025, labels the sector as “overvalued with downside risks,” citing persistent trade frictions. Verified surveys from Institutional Investor indicate that 65% of fund managers plan to underweight China-dependent tech holdings in the coming year, up from 50% in 2024.

These projections, while optimistic in baseline scenarios, incorporate downside adjustments for escalated enforcement. Broader market sentiment, as gauged by the VIX index’s tech subcomponent, has shown spikes correlating with US-China news cycles, underscoring the theme’s potency.

Broader Economic Ramifications

Beyond individual firms, the surveillance-tracker episode amplifies calls for a reevaluation of global trade norms. If trackers become standard, compliance costs could rise, potentially adding 1-2% to logistics expenses for exporters, as estimated in a 2024 McKinsey report on supply chain resilience. For China, this fuels narratives of self-reliance, with initiatives like the “Made in China 2025” plan accelerating domestic chip production—already yielding a 20% increase in output from 2020 to 2023, per state statistics.

Investors should monitor diplomatic channels, such as upcoming G20 summits, for signs of de-escalation. Absent that, a bifurcated tech ecosystem looms, where Western and Eastern blocs develop parallel standards, fragmenting markets and diluting economies of scale. Analyst-led models from Eurasia Group forecast a potential 10% drag on global GDP growth by 2030 if decoupling intensifies.

Strategic Considerations for Investors

In navigating this landscape, diversification emerges as a key imperative. Portfolios heavy in semiconductors might benefit from hedges via ETFs tracking resilient sectors like renewable energy or healthcare tech, less prone to bilateral spats. Long-term, opportunities lie in beneficiaries of reshoring, such as US-based foundries or Taiwanese firms with diversified footprints.

Ultimately, this episode serves as a stark reminder that in the high-stakes arena of tech geopolitics, surveillance—whether real or alleged—casts long shadows over innovation and investment returns. As the US and China continue their jostle for dominance, savvy analysts will watch not just the chips, but the broader game board.

References

• Reuters. (2025, August 15). Chinese state media calls US surveillance empire over trackers in chip shipments. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinese-state-media-calls-us-surveillance-empire-over-trackers-chip-shipments-2025-08-15/
• Investing.com. (2025). Chinese state media calls US a surveillance empire over trackers in chip shipments. Retrieved from https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/chinese-state-media-calls-us-a-surveillance-empire-over-trackers-in-chip-shipments-4195663
• The Economic Times. (2025). Chinese state media calls US a surveillance empire over trackers in chip shipments. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/chinese-state-media-calls-u-s-a-surveillance-empire-over-trackers-in-chip-shipments/articleshow/123324100.cms
• AllSides. (2025). Chinese state media calls US surveillance empire over trackers. Retrieved from https://www.allsides.com/news/2025-08-15-0829/defense-and-security-chinese-state-media-calls-us-surveillance-empire-over
• Reuters. (2025, August 13). US embeds trackers in AI chip shipments to catch diversions to China, sources say. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/china/us-embeds-trackers-ai-chip-shipments-catch-diversions-china-sources-say-2025-08-13/
• TechStory. (2025). U.S. authorities secretly embed trackers in chip shipments to curb smuggling to China. Retrieved from https://techstory.in/u-s-authorities-secretly-embed-trackers-in-chip-shipments-to-curb-smuggling-to-china/
• Ground News. (2025). Exclusive: US embeds trackers in AI chip shipments to catch diversions to China, sources say. Retrieved from https://ground.news/article/exclusive-us-embeds-trackers-in-ai-chip-shipments-to-catch-diversions-to-china-sources-say
• LiveMint. (2025). US installs location trackers in advanced chip shipments to prevent illegal diversion to China. Retrieved from https://livemint.com/news/us-news/us-installs-location-trackers-in-advanced-chip-shipments-to-prevent-illegal-diversion-to-china-report-11755145140122.html
• India Today. (2025). US secretly hiding trackers in AI chip shipments to catch illegal diversions to China. Retrieved from https://indiatoday.in/amp/technology/news/story/us-secretly-hiding-trackers-in-ai-chip-shipments-to-catch-illegal-diversions-to-china-report-2771098-2025-08-14
• TechHQ. (2025). US-China chip surveillance: double standards? Retrieved from https://techhq.com/news/us-china-chip-surveillance-double-standards
• DevDiscourse. (2025). The chip war: surveillance or security? Retrieved from https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/technology/3543181-the-chip-war-surveillance-or-security
• Yahoo News. (2025). Chinese state media calls US a surveillance empire. Retrieved from https://ca.news.yahoo.com/chinese-state-media-calls-u-151909034.html