Key Takeaways
- Tesla is strategically diversifying its Dojo 3 AI chip supply chain, engaging Samsung for 2nm fabrication and Intel for advanced packaging, thereby moving away from its previous sole reliance on TSMC.
- This realignment is primarily driven by a desire to mitigate geopolitical risks, avoid the supply chain bottlenecks experienced in recent years, and secure a technological edge through next-generation chip processes.
- The partnership aims to leverage Samsung’s US-based 2nm node and Intel’s EMIB packaging to fuel a significant performance leap in Tesla’s AI infrastructure, which underpins its autonomous driving, supercomputing, and robotics ambitions.
- While the move has prompted a positive market response, it introduces execution risks, including the unproven nature of Samsung’s 2nm yields at scale and potential integration complexities within Tesla’s bespoke ecosystem.
Tesla’s pivot in its Dojo 3 supply chain, opting for Samsung’s 2nm fabrication and Intel’s advanced packaging over TSMC’s integrated approach, signals a calculated bet on diversification amid escalating geopolitical tensions and yield challenges in cutting-edge chipmaking.
Strategic Realignment in AI Chip Production
This shift underscores Tesla’s urgency to bolster its AI infrastructure without sole reliance on a single foundry giant. By enlisting Samsung for the front-end manufacturing of Dojo 3 chips at its nascent Texas facility, Tesla aims to harness 2nm process technology that promises denser transistors and superior energy efficiency—critical for the supercomputer’s voracious demands in training autonomous driving models. The move away from TSMC, which handled prior generations like the D1 chip on 7nm nodes, reflects lessons from supply bottlenecks that plagued the industry in recent years. Investors might recall how TSMC’s dominance, while reliable, exposed vulnerabilities during the 2022-2023 chip shortages, when wafer allocations became a zero-sum game for high-profile clients.
Intel’s role in advanced packaging, leveraging its Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge (EMIB) technology, adds another layer of sophistication. This isn’t mere assembly; it’s about integrating chiplets into a cohesive unit that maximises throughput for AI workloads. For Dojo 3, which builds on the wafer-scale ambitions of its predecessors, such packaging could mitigate thermal issues and boost interconnect speeds, potentially elevating Tesla’s computational edge over rivals like NVIDIA-dependent systems. The dual-vendor strategy marks a departure from Tesla’s earlier all-in bets, echoing broader industry trends where companies like Apple have split suppliers to hedge risks.
Implications for Tesla’s AI Roadmap
At its core, this supply chain reconfiguration powers Tesla’s next-gen AI chips, integral to Dojo’s evolution. Dojo 3 is poised to scale beyond the ExaPOD configurations of earlier iterations, where multiple cabinets housed thousands of D1 dies for exascale computing. With Samsung’s 2nm node—slated for mass production by 2028, according to reports from manufacturing sources—Dojo could achieve a 40-fold compute leap over current setups, as hinted in prior TSMC collaborations. This isn’t hyperbole; it’s grounded in the physics of node shrinkage, where each generational shrink historically doubles transistor density, slashing power consumption by up to 30% per task.
Expanding on this, the shift facilitates Tesla’s unified AI architecture, extending from Dojo supercomputers to Optimus robots and vehicle inferencing. Historical data from Tesla’s 2022 AI Day reveals how Dojo’s initial D1 chips, fabricated by TSMC, enabled a 5x performance boost in neural network training compared to GPU clusters. By diversifying now, Tesla mitigates risks like Taiwan’s seismic vulnerabilities or U.S.-China trade frictions, which have jittered TSMC’s stock in the past.
Market Ripples and Competitive Dynamics
The involvement of Intel and Samsung injects fresh momentum into their foundry ambitions, potentially reshaping alliances in the AI chip arena. Samsung’s reported $16.5 billion multi-year deal with Tesla positions it as a credible challenger to TSMC’s 90% market share in advanced nodes. This contract, spanning 4nm to 2nm processes, could validate Samsung’s yield improvements after years of teething troubles—yields that lagged TSMC’s by 10-15% in 3nm trials back in 2024. For Tesla, locking in U.S.-based production at Samsung’s Taylor plant reduces latency in the supply chain, a boon for iterative AI development where time-to-market is paramount.
Intel, meanwhile, stands to gain from its packaging prowess, even as its own fabrication stumbles have seen shares languish. Its EMIB tech could become a linchpin for heterogeneous integration, allowing Tesla to mix-and-match dies for optimised Dojo tiles. This contrasts with TSMC’s InFO-SoW packaging used in Dojo 2, which integrated 25 chiplets per wafer but faced scaling hurdles at finer nodes. Analyst sentiment from firms like Bernstein, labelling the shift as a “prudent diversification,” suggests it could stabilise Tesla’s AI spend, projected at $10 billion annually by company guidance, without the premiums tied to TSMC exclusivity.
Risks and Forward Projections
Yet, this realignment isn’t without pitfalls. Transitioning suppliers mid-generation risks delays, as seen in Tesla’s own history with Dojo 1 ramp-ups that missed 2021 targets by quarters. Samsung’s 2nm yields remain unproven at scale, and Intel’s packaging, while innovative, must contend with compatibility teething in a custom AI ecosystem. Model-based forecasts from Wedbush Securities peg Dojo 3’s contribution to Tesla’s valuation at a 15-20% uplift by 2027, assuming seamless integration boosts Full Self-Driving (FSD) accuracy to 99.9%—a threshold for regulatory approval in autonomous fleets.
Market reaction has been telling: Tesla shares climbed in the prior session, bucking a decline over the past 200 days. This pop likely reflects investor optimism over reduced geopolitical exposure, especially as TSMC’s Arizona expansions face delays. Sentiment from verified accounts at Morgan Stanley remains bullish, citing the shift as enhancing Tesla’s moat in AI-driven mobility, though they caution on execution risks.
Broader Supply Chain Echoes
In contextualising this move, consider how it amplifies Tesla’s push for vertical integration, reminiscent of its battery supply pivots in 2020 that cut costs by 20%. By splitting Dojo 3 between Samsung’s fabrication and Intel’s packaging, Tesla not only diversifies but potentially negotiates better terms—analysts at UBS estimate a 10% cost saving per wafer compared to TSMC’s quotes. This could free capital for scaling Dojo to multiple ExaPODs, each packing over a million cores, as envisioned in 2022 updates.
Ultimately, the shift illuminates Tesla’s adaptive strategy in a chip landscape fraught with scarcity. As AI chips evolve to power everything from robotaxis to humanoid bots, this reconfiguration might just be the edge that keeps Tesla ahead, provided the new partners deliver on their promises. Investors watching the space would do well to monitor yield reports from Samsung’s Texas fab in the coming quarters, as they could dictate the timeline for Dojo 3’s deployment and its ripple effects on Tesla’s ambitious growth trajectory.
References
AInvest. (2025, July). *Samsung’s $16.5B Tesla Chip Deal: A Strategic Turnaround for Foundry Business?*. Retrieved from ainvest.com
Bernstein. (2025, July). Analyst commentary on Tesla’s supply chain diversification. (As cited in financial news reports).
Digitimes. (2025, August 4). *DIGITIMES Asia weekly news roundup: Tesla picks Samsung over TSMC for next-gen chips, Intel for advanced packaging*. Retrieved from digitimes.com
Kim, J. [@JaeKim1089208]. (2025, August). Post regarding Tesla and Samsung chip manufacturing deal. *X*. Retrieved from x.com/JaeKim1089208/status/1949673543815573926
Lambert, F. (2024, May 1). *Tesla is starting production of its next-gen Dojo AI training tile*. Electrek. Retrieved from electrek.co
Manufacturing Digital. (2025, July). *Tesla secures US$16.5bn Samsung chip manufacturing deal*. Retrieved from manufacturingdigital.com
Morgan Stanley. (2025, July). Investor note on Tesla’s AI strategy and execution risks. (As cited in financial news reports).
Nasdaq. (2025, August 7). *Market data for Tesla (TSLA), Intel (INTC), and TSMC (TSM)*. Nasdaq Stock Market. Retrieved from nasdaq.com
Nystedt, D. [@dnystedt]. (2025, August). Post discussing Tesla, Samsung, and Intel partnership for Dojo 3. *X*. Retrieved from x.com/dnystedt/status/1868841340689326256
O’Donnell, D. (2025, August). *Tesla AI6 chip on Samsung 2nm process may first go to Optimus and Dojo, not cars*. Notebookcheck. Retrieved from notebookcheck.net
overnightstocks.com [@overnightstocks]. (2025, August 7). Post regarding Tesla’s Dojo 3 supply chain shift. *X*.
TrendForce. (2024, May 3). *TSMC Reportedly Commences Production of Tesla’s Next-Generation Dojo Chips, Anticipates 40x Increase in Computing Power in 3 Years*. Retrieved from trendforce.com
Wedbush Securities. (2025, July). Research note forecasting Dojo 3’s contribution to Tesla’s valuation. (As cited in financial news reports).
Wikipedia. (2024). *Tesla Dojo*. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Dojo
