The call for a comprehensive review of the Federal Reserve by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, as noted in passing on social media platforms like X through accounts such as unusual_whales, has ignited a critical discussion about the central bank’s role in the US economy. The sharpest concern lies not in the suggestion of a review itself, but in whether the Federal Reserve’s current structure and policies are adequately equipped to address the economic challenges of 2025. With inflation pressures lingering and growth forecasts uncertain, a deep examination of the Fed’s mandate, decision-making processes, and institutional effectiveness may be less a political jab and more a pragmatic necessity.
The Context of Criticism
In recent months, the Federal Reserve has faced scrutiny over its handling of monetary policy, particularly in balancing inflation control with economic growth. As of Q2 2025 (April to June), the US inflation rate, as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, stood at 2.8%, just above the Fed’s long-term target of 2%. Meanwhile, GDP growth slowed to an annualised rate of 2.0% in the same period, per the Bureau of Economic Analysis, raising questions about whether the Fed’s interest rate hikes—peaking at 5.25% in late 2024—have stifled expansion without sufficiently curbing price pressures. Bessent’s advocacy for a review appears to stem from a belief that systemic issues within the Fed may be contributing to these mixed outcomes, a perspective gaining traction amid public and political frustration.
Historically, the Fed has operated with significant independence, a principle designed to shield monetary policy from short-term political influence. Yet, this independence does not equate to immunity from critique. The Treasury Secretary’s suggestion to scrutinise the ‘entire’ institution—beyond specific policies or leadership—signals a broader concern: is the Fed’s framework, established over a century ago, still fit for purpose in a digital, globalised economy?
Key Areas for Review
Several aspects of the Federal Reserve’s operations warrant closer examination. First, its dual mandate of price stability and full employment often creates conflicting priorities. In Q1 2025 (January to March), the unemployment rate hovered at 4.0%, a relatively low figure, yet inflationary pressures persisted, suggesting that the Fed’s tools may be too blunt to address both goals simultaneously. A review could explore whether a narrower focus—perhaps prioritising inflation control—might yield clearer results, or if alternative metrics for employment health should be considered.
Second, the Fed’s communication strategy has drawn criticism for lacking clarity. Market participants frequently parse Fed Chair statements for hints of policy shifts, leading to volatility. For instance, in early July 2025, mixed signals on potential rate cuts contributed to a 1.7% drop in the S&P 500 over a single week, as reported by Reuters. A more transparent or structured approach to guidance could mitigate such disruptions, a point likely to feature in any institutional review.
Finally, the Fed’s balance sheet management, particularly its handling of quantitative tightening, remains contentious. As of June 2025, the Fed’s holdings of Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities stood at approximately $7.5 trillion, down from a peak of nearly $9 trillion in 2022, according to Federal Reserve data. While this reduction aims to normalise monetary policy, critics argue it has strained liquidity in financial markets, a concern that merits rigorous analysis.
Potential Implications of a Review
A comprehensive review of the Federal Reserve could have far-reaching consequences. On one hand, it might uncover inefficiencies or outdated practices, paving the way for reforms that enhance the central bank’s effectiveness. For instance, modernising the Fed’s technological infrastructure to better monitor real-time economic data could improve decision-making—a point often overlooked in policy debates.
On the other hand, such a review risks undermining the Fed’s independence if perceived as politically motivated. Historical comparisons to the 1970s, when political pressure on the Fed contributed to stagflation, serve as a cautionary tale. Inflation in 1979 averaged 11.3%, a stark contrast to the 2.8% of Q2 2025, but the lesson remains: meddling with central bank autonomy can backfire spectacularly. Any review must, therefore, be conducted with clear boundaries to avoid eroding market confidence.
Balancing Act: Growth vs. Stability
The Treasury Secretary’s push for a review also raises a broader question about the US economy’s trajectory. Bessent has publicly stated that the economy is ‘on the cusp’ of significant growth, reminiscent of the 1990s dot-com boom, but only if structural barriers are addressed. Whether the Fed is one such barrier remains debatable. The central bank’s cautious approach to rate adjustments in 2025—holding steady at 5.25% as of mid-July—reflects a prioritisation of stability over stimulus, a stance that may frustrate growth advocates but aligns with its mandate to prevent overheating.
Ultimately, the debate over a Federal Reserve review is less about immediate policy shifts and more about long-term institutional resilience. If conducted with intellectual rigour and insulated from partisan agendas, such an exercise could strengthen the Fed’s capacity to navigate future crises. If mishandled, it risks turning a vital economic pillar into a political football—a game with few winners.
Conclusion
The suggestion to review the Federal Reserve in its entirety is not merely a headline-grabbing statement but a prompt for serious reflection. With inflation stubbornly above target, growth tepid, and market expectations jittery, the central bank’s performance in 2025 demands scrutiny. However, any evaluation must prioritise evidence over ideology, focusing on tangible improvements rather than symbolic wins. After all, in the high-stakes world of monetary policy, a misstep is rarely forgiven by markets or history.
References
- ABC17 News. (2025, July 21). Bessent: The Trump administration should look into the Fed’s many mistakes. Retrieved from https://abc17news.com/news/2025/07/21/bessent-the-trump-administration-should-look-into-the-feds-many-mistakes/
- Bloomberg. (2025, June 10). Bessent Emerges as Possible Contender to Succeed Fed’s Powell. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-10/bessent-emerges-as-possible-contender-to-succeed-fed-s-powell
- Bloomberg. (2025, July 15). Bessent Says Formal Process for Powell Successor Has Started. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-15/bessent-says-formal-process-for-powell-succcessor-has-started
- Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2025, July 18). Gross Domestic Product, Second Quarter 2025. Retrieved from https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-second-quarter-2025
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025, April 5). Employment Situation Summary. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025, July 11). Consumer Price Index Summary. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
- CNBC. (2025, July 21). Treasury Secretary Bessent Calls for a Review of the Entire Federal Reserve. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/21/treasury-secretary-bessent-calls-for-a-review-of-the-entire-federal-reserve.html
- Federal Reserve. (2025, June 30). Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h8/current/
- Federal Reserve. (2025, July 15). Monetary Policy Report. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/2025-07-mpr-summary.htm
- Federal Reserve History. (n.d.). The Great Inflation. Retrieved from https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/great-inflation
- Investing.com. (2025, July 21). US Treasury’s Bessent says Federal Reserve needs to be examined as an institution. Retrieved from https://investing.com/news/economy-news/us-treasurys-bessent-says-federal-reserve-needs-to-be-examined-as-an-institution-4143849
- Marketscreener. (2025, July 21). U.S. Treasury’s Bessent says Federal Reserve needs to be examined as an institution. Retrieved from https://www.marketscreener.com/news/us-treasury-s-bessent-says-federal-reserve-needs-to-be-examined-as-an-institution-ce7c5cdfd08bf52c
- News-Pravda. (2025, July 21). Bessent: The Trump administration should look into the Fed’s many mistakes. Retrieved from https://usa.news-pravda.com/world/2025/07/21/387853.html
- Reuters. (2025, July 8). Wall Street Falls as Fed Uncertainty Weighs. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/wall-st-falls-fed-uncertainty-2025-07-08/
- The Hill. (2024, May 15). Scott Bessent says he would push for audit of Federal Reserve if he leads Treasury under Trump. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/business/5394914-scott-bessent-federal-reserve-trump-administration/
- The New York Times. (2025, July 9). Bessent, a Top Trump Ally, Escalates His Criticism of the Fed Chair. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/09/us/politics/bessent-federal-reserve-chair.html
- unusual_whales [@unusual_whales]. (2024, May 14). [Post]. X. Retrieved from https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1899253184922857832
- unusual_whales [@unusual_whales]. (2024, May 29). [Post]. X. Retrieved from https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1900262334632714599
- unusual_whales [@unusual_whales]. (2024, June 27). [Post]. X. Retrieved from https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1909500708136645114
- unusual_whales [@unusual_whales]. (2024, August 28). [Post]. X. Retrieved from https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1932847852625277026
- unusual_whales [@unusual_whales]. (2024, September 12). [Post]. X. Retrieved from https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1937842459922325732
