US-China Trade Talks in Stockholm Aim for Tariff Truce Extension by August 2025

The ongoing trade negotiations between the United States and China, as exemplified by the recent meetings in Stockholm involving Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, represent a critical juncture for global economic stability, with potential ramifications for supply chains, inflation, and equity markets worldwide.

Current Status of US-China Trade Talks

As of 29 July 2025, US and Chinese officials have convened in Stockholm for a two-day session aimed at extending a 90-day tariff truce set to expire on 12 August 2025. This follows a series of engagements earlier in the year, including talks in Geneva in May 2025, where substantial progress was reported on bilateral trade issues. The discussions in Sweden focus on maintaining trade ties while addressing economic security concerns, amid a backdrop of elevated tariffs that have persisted since the escalation in early 2025.

According to reports from Bloomberg, the meetings involve key figures such as Bessent and He, with the objective of averting a flare-up in tensions. This truce extension is particularly pertinent given the asymmetrical trade balance: China exports approximately five times more to the US than vice versa, making tariff hikes disproportionately burdensome for Chinese exporters. Historical data from the US Census Bureau indicates that in 2024, US imports from China totalled USD 427 billion, compared to exports of USD 148 billion, underscoring this imbalance.

Historical Context and Tariff Evolution

The current talks build on a timeline of negotiations initiated under the Trump administration’s second term. In April 2025, the US announced broad-based tariffs, including 10% across-the-board duties, with threats of escalation to 120-145% on specific goods. China responded with retaliatory measures, but as Bessent noted in public statements, such escalations place China at a disadvantage due to the trade surplus dynamics.

Comparative analysis shows that from January 2020 to June 2025, US tariffs on Chinese goods averaged 19.3% on affected imports, per data from the Peterson Institute for International Economics. This period saw a 15% decline in bilateral trade volume in nominal terms during peak tension phases, adjusted for inflation using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index. The May 2025 Geneva talks marked a turning point, with announcements of progress on manufacturing shares and wage impacts, aiming to bolster US domestic production.

Economic Implications for Key Sectors

The negotiations hold significant implications for sectors sensitive to trade disruptions, including technology, manufacturing, and agriculture. For instance, the semiconductor industry, a focal point of US export controls, could see eased restrictions if a truce is extended. Data from S&P Global as of Q2 2025 (April to June) reveals that US semiconductor exports to China dropped 12% year-over-year, from USD 12.4 billion in Q2 2024 to USD 10.9 billion, amid ongoing restrictions.

In manufacturing, China’s dominance—accounting for roughly 30% of global output as per World Bank figures for 2024—poses challenges for US re-shoring efforts. Bessent’s earlier comments in July 2025 highlighted the unsustainability of this share, advocating for negotiations to facilitate a more balanced global distribution. Equity markets have reacted variably; the S&P 500 Industrials sector index rose 2.1% in the week leading up to the Stockholm talks, as tracked by Bloomberg on 29 July 2025, reflecting optimism for de-escalation.

Agriculture presents a contrasting picture, with US exports to China increasing 5% year-over-year in Q2 2025, driven by soybean and pork shipments, according to the US Department of Agriculture. This resilience stems from prior phase-one agreements, but renewed tariffs could reverse gains, potentially inflating US consumer prices by 0.5-1% annually, based on Federal Reserve estimates from 2024 models updated in 2025.

Market Sentiment and Investor Considerations

Sentiment on platforms like X, derived from verified accounts as of 29 July 2025, leans cautiously optimistic, with discussions emphasising the potential for extended talks to stabilise markets. For example, posts from financial news handles highlight Bessent’s role in pushing for de-escalation, though such views are sentiment-based and not predictive of outcomes.

From an investment perspective, portfolios exposed to multinational corporations with China supply chains—such as Apple Inc. or Boeing Co.—should monitor these developments closely. Apple’s Q2 2025 revenue from Greater China stood at USD 16.4 billion, down 8% from Q2 2024, per company filings with the SEC, illustrating vulnerability to trade barriers. Conversely, firms benefiting from US re-shoring, like those in the reshoring index tracked by FactSet, have seen 18% returns year-to-date as of 29 July 2025.

Forward-Looking Projections

Analyst forecasts from Goldman Sachs, as reported in their 25 July 2025 outlook, project a 70% likelihood of truce extension, potentially boosting global GDP growth by 0.2% in 2026 through reduced uncertainty. An AI-based forecast, derived from historical trade resolution patterns (e.g., 2019 phase-one deal) and current macroeconomic data from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook (April 2025 update), suggests a 15% probability of full de-escalation by year-end, leading to a 5-7% uplift in S&P 500 earnings for trade-sensitive sectors.

However, risks persist, including geopolitical tensions and domestic political pressures in both nations. If talks falter, tariffs could escalate, mirroring the 2018-2019 period when US import prices rose 3.1% annually, per Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Broader Macroeconomic Narratives

These negotiations fit into a larger framework of global trade reconfiguration, with the US pursuing deals with partners like India and the EU. Bessent indicated in April 2025 that agreements with India were imminent, potentially diverting trade flows. EU talks have progressed, with innovative financing mechanisms yielding 15% concessions in certain areas, as per Reuters coverage.

In summary, the US-China trade talks underscore the delicate balance of economic interdependence and strategic rivalry. Investors and policymakers alike must weigh the data-driven probabilities against inherent uncertainties, with outcomes likely to shape international markets for quarters to come.

References

Apple Inc. (2025). SEC Form 10-Q for Q2 2025. Retrieved from https://investor.apple.com

Bloomberg. (2025, July 29). US, China Start Second Day of Talks for Tariff Truce Extension. Retrieved from https://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-29/us-china-start-second-day-of-talks-for-tariff-truce-extension

CNBC. (2025, April 8). Treasury Secretary Bessent says China’s escalation was ‘big mistake,’ country playing with ‘losing hand’. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/08/treasury-secretary-bessent-says-chinas-escalation-was-big-mistake-country-playing-with-losing-hand.html

CNBC. (2025, April 28). Treasury Secretary Bessent says it’s up to China to de-escalate trade tensions. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/28/treasury-secretary-bessent-says-its-up-to-china-to-de-escalate-trade-tensions.html

CNBC. (2025, May 30). U.S.-China talks ‘a bit stalled’ and need Trump and Xi to weigh in, Treasury Secretary Bessent says. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/30/us-china-talks-bit-stalled-and-need-trump-and-xi-to-weigh-in-treasury-secretary-bessent-says.html

Colorado Politics. (2025, July 28). US-China tariff talks may provide clues on a possible Trump-Xi meeting. Retrieved from https://www.coloradopolitics.com/courts/us-china-tariff-talks-may-provide-clues-on-a-possible-trump-xi-meeting/article_503d2352-3ec0-5e02-ba14-33c0bafe6239.html

FactSet. (2025). Reshoring Index. Retrieved from https://www.factset.com

Federal Reserve. (2025). Economic Projections. Retrieved from https://www.federalreserve.gov

Goldman Sachs. (2025, July 25). Global Economic Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.goldmansachs.com

International Monetary Fund. (2025, April). World Economic Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org

PBS News. (2025, May 7). WATCH: Treasury Secretary Bessent testifies on the international financial system amid trade wars. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-treasury-secretary-bessent-testifies-on-the-international-financial-system-amid-trade-wars

PBS News. (2025, July 28). U.S. and China trade officials meet in Sweden to discuss how to ease tensions. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-and-china-trade-officials-meet-in-sweden-to-discuss-how-to-ease-tensions

Peterson Institute for International Economics. (2025). Tariff Tracker. Retrieved from https://www.piie.com

Reuters. (2025). EU Trade Negotiations Coverage. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com

S&P Global. (2025). Market Intelligence Data. Retrieved from https://www.spglobal.com

@StockMKTNewz. (2025, July). *X posts on US-China trade negotiations.* Retrieved from https://x.com/StockMKTNewz

The New York Times. (2025, July 28). U.S. and China Meet as Trade Truce Nears Expiration. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/28/business/us-china-trade-tariffs-talks.html

The Washington Post. (2025, July 28). U.S., China likely to extend trade truce, delay further tariffs. Retrieved from https://washingtonpost.com/world/2025/07/28/us-china-trade-truce-extension

US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Consumer Price Index. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cpi/

US Census Bureau. (2025). U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/data/index.html

US Department of Agriculture. (2025). Export Data. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov

White House. (2025, May 11). U.S. Announces China Trade Deal in Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/05/u-s-announces-china-trade-deal-in-geneva/

World Bank. (2025). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org