US Secretary of State Rubio: New 2025 Sanctions Won’t Force Russia to End War Despite Economic Strain

As the conflict in Ukraine drags into its fourth year, the efficacy of Western sanctions against Russia remains a focal point for investors and policymakers alike. Despite an array of measures aimed at crippling Russia’s economic capacity to sustain military operations, evidence suggests that additional sanctions may fall short of forcing a cessation of hostilities. This analysis explores the evolving impact of these sanctions on Russia’s war economy in 2025, drawing on recent assessments of trade disruptions, energy sector pressures, and broader macroeconomic trends.

The Resilience of Russia’s War Economy Amid Sanctions

Russia’s economy has demonstrated a degree of adaptability in the face of sustained Western sanctions, which were first intensified following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. By mid-2025, these measures—encompassing financial isolation, energy export restrictions, and technology bans—have undeniably reshaped Russia’s economic landscape. However, they have not yet eroded the Kremlin’s ability to fund its military campaign to a breaking point.

According to analyses from think tanks, sanctions have led to a notable decline in Russia’s trade with sanctioning nations, particularly in the European Union. For instance, a March 2025 column from the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) highlighted that while bilateral trade with sanctioning states dropped significantly, Russia has pivoted towards non-sanctioning countries, effectively liberalising trade flows and mitigating primary losses. This deflection—rerouting exports through third parties—has allowed Russia to maintain revenue streams, especially from commodities like oil and gas, which continue to underpin its budget.

The energy sector, a linchpin of Russia’s economy, has been a primary target. In January 2025, the US Treasury Department expanded sanctions to include broader operations in Russia’s energy industry, aiming to curb revenues funding the war. Yet, as noted in a February 2025 report from the Economics Observatory, these efforts have disrupted but not halted Russia’s oil and gas exports. Global energy prices have fluctuated, but Russia’s ability to sell at discounted rates to markets in Asia has preserved substantial inflows. Projections indicate that military spending could reach approximately 8% of GDP in 2025, equating to around $172 billion, underscoring how energy revenues continue to fuel defence outlays despite sanctions.

Economic Indicators Pointing to Strain, Not Collapse

While sanctions have imposed costs, Russia’s macroeconomic indicators reveal a picture of stagnation rather than outright collapse. Recent reports suggest GDP growth may hover between 1% and 2% in 2025, hampered by high inflation potentially reaching 10% and a distorted labour market exacerbated by wartime demands. A February 2025 analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) described how sanctions have altered Russia’s economic future, forcing reallocations towards military production at the expense of civilian sectors. This shift has led to overheating in some areas, with banks compelled to extend low-interest loans to defence firms, masking underlying inefficiencies.

Inflationary pressures are mounting, driven by military expenditures and supply chain disruptions. Posts on social media platform X in mid-2025 have echoed sentiments from analysts predicting that Russia’s liquid reserves could deplete, prompting potential cuts in public spending. Such views align with a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) brief from August 2025, which noted that three years of sanctions have blunted Russia’s military edge but injected uncertainty amid political shifts in the US. The reelection of President Trump has not relaxed the sanctions regime; instead, new tariff threats have emerged to pressure negotiations, though their effectiveness remains debated.

A key challenge is evasion. The Economics Observatory’s assessment in February 2025 pointed out that unilateral and piecemeal sanctions have been undermined by trade deflection through third countries, limiting their overall impact. This has allowed Russia to sustain weapon production, albeit at rates that may not fully offset battlefield losses, as suggested in various expert commentaries.

Implications for the War and Global Markets

The persistence of Russia’s military efforts despite sanctions raises questions about their strategic leverage. A special report from the Institute for the Study of War in February 2025 argued that Russia’s economic weaknesses in 2025 could be exploited for concessions, provided Western support for Ukraine remains robust. However, if new sanctions fail to compel a halt to the war—as some analyses imply—they may instead entrench Russia’s pivot away from Western markets, fostering deeper ties with non-aligned economies.

For investors, this scenario carries multifaceted risks. Escalating sanctions could elevate global energy prices, with models from Bloomberg in June 2025 estimating that a broader Russia-NATO conflict might shave 1.3% off global GDP through destruction, market collapses, and commodity spikes. Sentiment among credible sources, such as Reuters in August 2025, warns that secondary sanctions on Russia’s trade partners could backfire, raising US inflation and complicating trade deals with powers like India and China.

Analyst-led forecasts, including those from Carnegie in August 2025, suggest that Russia’s war economy faces a tipping point. With military spending hidden in bank balance sheets and oil revenues shrinking, stagflation could set in, potentially forcing fiscal adjustments. Yet, as a Novaya Gazeta Europe article from August 2025 observed, the economy is stagnant but not collapsing, implying that sanctions alone may not suffice to end the conflict without complementary diplomatic or military pressures.

Potential Scenarios and Investor Considerations

• Escalation Risks: If sanctions intensify without yielding concessions, Russia might accelerate military production, leading to prolonged conflict and volatile commodity markets. Investors in energy sectors should monitor for supply disruptions, with historical precedents like the 2022 price surges serving as cautionary tales.
• Adaptation Strategies: Russia’s trade liberalisation with third countries could create opportunities in emerging markets, but it heightens geopolitical risks for multinationals exposed to sanction evasion scrutiny.
• Economic Leverage Points: Targeting frozen assets, as discussed in sanctions-focused analyses, could deprive Russia of up to $600 million daily in revenue, potentially accelerating ruble depreciation. However, this requires coordinated international action, which has been inconsistent.

In summary, while US-led sanctions have inflicted measurable damage on Russia’s economy—evident in trade declines, inflationary spikes, and fiscal strains—they appear insufficient on their own to compel an end to the war in Ukraine. As 2025 progresses, the interplay between economic resilience and mounting pressures will shape both the conflict’s trajectory and global investment landscapes. Investors would do well to hedge against prolonged uncertainty, prioritising diversified portfolios resilient to energy shocks and geopolitical volatility.

References

• Al Bawaba. (2025). American economic sanctions on Russia. https://albawaba.com/business/american-economic-sanctions-russia-1610506
• Asia Times. (2025, July). New US sanctions will have little to no effect on Russia. https://asiatimes.com/2025/07/new-us-sanctions-will-have-little-to-no-effect-on-russia/
• Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2025, August). [Forecasts on Russia’s war economy].
• Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2025, February). How sanctions have reshaped Russia’s future. https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-sanctions-have-reshaped-russias-future
• Centre for Economic Policy Research. (2025, March). The effectiveness of sanctions on Russia: New data and new evidence. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/effectiveness-sanctions-russia-new-data-and-new-evidence
• Consilium. (2025). The impact of sanctions on the Russian economy. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/impact-sanctions-russian-economy/
• Council on Foreign Relations. (2025, August). Three years into the war in Ukraine: Are sanctions against Russia making a difference? https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/three-years-war-ukraine-are-sanctions-against-russia-making-difference
• Economics Observatory. (2025, February). Sanctions effectiveness: What lessons three years into the war on Ukraine. https://www.economicsobservatory.com/sanctions-effectiveness-what-lessons-three-years-into-the-war-on-ukraine
• Economics Observatory. (2025). What effects have energy sanctions had on Russia’s ability to wage war? https://economicsobservatory.com/what-effects-have-energy-sanctions-had-on-russias-ability-to-wage-war
• Institute for the Study of War. (2025, February). [Special report via X]. https://x.com/TheStudyofWar/status/1892299366439801062
• Novaya Gazeta Europe. (2025, August 10). Running out of road. https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2025/08/10/running-out-of-road-en
• Observer Research Foundation. (2025). Charting US sanctions on Russia: Retrospect and the road ahead. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/charting-us-sanctions-on-russia-retrospect-and-road-ahead
• RT. (2025). US sanctions on Russia could backfire. https://www.rt.com/news/622559-us-sanctions-russia-could-backfire-cnn/
• TASS. (2025). Russia’s fiscal response to sanction pressure. https://tass.com/economy/1999785
• US Department of the Treasury. (2025, January). Expanded sanctions on Russia’s energy operations. https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2777
• US Department of State. (2025). Ukraine and Russia Sanctions. https://www.state.gov/division-for-counter-threat-finance-and-sanctions/ukraine-and-russia-sanctions
• X Account: Euromaidan Press. https://x.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1858170732473168104
• X Account: Jay in Kyiv. https://x.com/JayinKyiv/status/1863181040350605621
• X Account: MAKS 25 🇺🇦👀. https://x.com/Maks_NAFO_FELLA/status/1937519540520308859
• X Account: Phillips P. OBrien. https://x.com/PhillipsPOBrien/status/1857097785331351945
• X Account: Tymofiy Mylovanov. https://x.com/Mylovanov/status/1956111528903799015