87.2% of US Households Remain ETF-Free in 2024 Despite $673B Inflows Through July

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have surged in popularity over the past decade, yet their adoption remains surprisingly limited among American households. As of 2024, only around 12.8% of US households hold ETFs, marking a significant increase from just 2.8% in 2010, but still leaving a vast majority—87.2%—without exposure to these versatile investment vehicles. This disparity highlights a broader trend in retail investing, where accessibility has improved dramatically, but participation lags behind potential, influenced by factors ranging from financial literacy to economic inequalities.

The Rise of ETFs and Household Participation

ETFs, which track indices, commodities, or baskets of assets and trade like stocks, have transformed the investment landscape since their inception in the early 1990s. By offering low-cost, diversified exposure, they have attracted trillions in assets under management globally. In the US, ETF inflows reached $673 billion through July 2025, putting the market on pace for another year exceeding $1 trillion, driven by products like equity, bond, and even cryptocurrency-linked funds.

Despite this boom, household ownership tells a different story. Data indicates that while ETF holdings have grown more than fourfold in percentage terms since 2010, the absolute penetration remains modest. This growth aligns with broader shifts in passive investing, where ETFs and index funds now account for a substantial portion of market assets. For context, passive funds’ ownership of US stocks hit 19% as of 2023, up from lower levels in prior decades, yet this institutional dominance has not fully translated to individual households.

Comparisons with mutual funds underscore the gap: in 2023, 52% of US households owned mutual fund shares, a figure that dwarfs ETF participation. This suggests ETFs, often praised for their efficiency and lower fees, have yet to supplant traditional vehicles in the average investor’s portfolio. Analysts attribute this to inertia, with many households sticking to familiar mutual funds through employer-sponsored plans or advisory services.

Factors Limiting ETF Adoption

Several barriers contribute to the low ownership rate. Financial education plays a pivotal role; surveys reveal that a significant portion of Americans lack confidence in navigating investment options beyond basic savings accounts. Economic disparities further exacerbate the issue. According to Pew Research Center data from 2024, nearly two-thirds of White families (66%) own stocks directly or indirectly, compared to 39% of Black families and 28% of Hispanic families. If ETF ownership mirrors these inequities, it implies that growth is concentrated among higher-income, better-educated demographics.

Market conditions also influence participation. US households now allocate a record 30% of their financial assets to equities as of mid-2025, surpassing peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. This heavy reliance on stocks, including through ETFs, exposes families to volatility, as seen in estimates of a $3 trillion drop in household equity wealth in the first quarter of 2025—the steepest since the 2022 bear market. Such fluctuations may deter risk-averse households from entering the fray.

Moreover, the allure of ETFs is tempered by competition from other assets. Homeownership, for instance, remains a primary wealth-building avenue, though rates dipped to 65% in the second quarter of 2025, the lowest since 2019, amid high mortgage rates and affordability challenges. With home equity gains totalling $115 billion in the first quarter of 2025, many households prioritise real estate over financial markets.

Implications for Investors and the Market

The underpenetration of ETFs among US households carries profound implications for market dynamics and economic policy. On one hand, it signals untapped potential: if participation were to double to 25% over the next decade, it could inject billions into ETF markets, bolstering liquidity and innovation. Analyst models, such as those from Ned Davis Research, suggest that current high optimism in stock allocations—nearing 57% of household totals—leaves limited room for further buying without fresh entrants.

From a sentiment perspective, credible sources like Bank of America estimates highlight concerns over liquidity. With household equity holdings reaching $56 trillion at the end of 2024 before a sharp quarterly decline, analysts warn that exhausted consumer sentiment, compounded by persistent inflation, could pressure asset prices. Ned Davis Research noted in early 2025 that elevated optimism raises questions about remaining buying power, labelling it as a potential risk factor for equities.

Broader trends point to a democratisation of investing, fuelled by fintech platforms and zero-commission trading. The rise in crypto ETFs, including spot and futures-based products tracking cryptocurrencies, exemplifies this evolution. Buffer funds offering downside protection in exchange for capped gains are gaining traction, potentially appealing to cautious households. Even niche developments, such as ETFs tied to meme coins like Dogecoin, slated for 2025 launches, could broaden appeal.

Future Outlook and Analyst Forecasts

Looking ahead, forecasts from models like those at the Investment Company Institute (ICI) project continued ETF growth, with assets potentially doubling by 2030 if adoption accelerates. However, this hinges on addressing barriers: enhanced financial literacy programmes and inclusive policies could lift ownership rates. If household allocations to equities remain at historic highs—tripling 1980s levels—ETFs stand to benefit disproportionately as passive strategies dominate.

Yet risks abound. In a scenario of prolonged market downturns, the 87.2% non-ownership rate could persist or widen, entrenching wealth gaps. Conversely, a sustained bull market might pull in sidelined households, mirroring the doubling of stock allocations over the past 15 years.

In summary, while ETFs represent a cornerstone of modern investing, their limited household penetration underscores persistent challenges in retail participation. As markets evolve, bridging this gap could unlock substantial value, but it requires concerted efforts to make these tools accessible to all.

References

• Advisor Perspectives. (2025, July 28). Home ownership rate Q2 2025. https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2025/07/28/home-ownership-rate-q2-2025
• ATTOM Data Solutions. (2025). Q1 2025 Affordability Index. https://attomdata.com/news/most-recent/q1-2025-affordability-index
• Business Insider. (2025). Stock market outlook: Peak household ownership & CEO confidence. https://www.businessinsider.com/stock-market-outlook-peak-household-ownership-ceo-confidence-sp500-ndr-2025-3
• ETF.com. (n.d.). Passive funds’ ownership of US stocks soars. https://www.etf.com/sections/news/passive-funds-ownership-us-stocks-soars
• Eye on Housing. (2025, April). Homeownership rate dips to five-year low. https://eyeonhousing.org/2025/04/homeownership-rate-dips-to-five-year-low
• Forbes. (n.d.). Pet ownership statistics. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/pet-insurance/pet-ownership-statistics/
• Investment Company Institute. (2024). ETF profiles data. https://www.ici.org/system/files/2024-12/23-etf-profiles-data.xlsx
• Mortgage Reports. (n.d.). Home equity gains. https://themortgagereports.com/108999/home-equity-gains
• Pew Research Center. (2024, March 6). A booming US stock market doesn’t benefit all racial and ethnic groups equally. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/06/a-booming-us-stock-market-doesnt-benefit-all-racial-and-ethnic-groups-equally/
• Statista. (n.d.). Mutual funds owned by American households. https://www.statista.com/statistics/246224/mutual-funds-owned-by-american-households/
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Exchange-traded fund. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange-traded_fund
• X (formerly Twitter). Various accounts — including @StockMKTNewz, @KobeissiLetter, @GlobalMktObserv — for market-related commentary referenced throughout the article.