Key Takeaways
- A proposed new round of tariffs targets a wide array of nations, with rates reaching as high as 40% for countries like Laos and Myanmar.
- Key US trading partners, including Canada (35%) and Switzerland (39%), face significant levies, signalling a potential disruption to established trade relationships.
- The tariffs are expected to ripple through global supply chains, particularly in sectors like technology and manufacturing, and could contribute to inflationary pressures in the US.
- Investors face heightened volatility, with risks for multinationals exposed to targeted countries and potential opportunities in domestic industries shielded from the tariffs.
President Trump’s latest round of tariffs targets a disparate group of nations, imposing levies that range from modest to punitive, ostensibly to address trade imbalances and protect American interests. With rates as high as 40% on Laos and Myanmar, and a hefty 35% on Canada, this move signals an aggressive recalibration of US trade policy, one that could ripple through global supply chains and investor portfolios alike.
The Tariff Landscape: Who Is Hit and How Hard
The proposed tariffs are a complex patchwork, hitting a diverse group of nations with rates ranging from punitive to merely inconvenient. The administration’s targets are spread across continents and economic profiles, as outlined in the table below.
| Country | Proposed Tariff Rate |
|---|---|
| Laos | 40% |
| Myanmar | 40% |
| Switzerland | 39% |
| Canada | 35% |
| Vietnam | 20% |
| Taiwan | 20% |
| Sri Lanka | 20% |
| Indonesia | 19% |
| New Zealand | 15% |
| Turkey | 15% |
| South Korea | 15% |
| Venezuela | 15% |
| Israel | 15% |
The highest rates are aimed at Southeast Asian economies like Laos and Myanmar, a move that could cripple their export-led growth in textiles and manufacturing. Canada’s 35% tariff is particularly noteworthy given the deeply integrated North American supply chains, while Switzerland’s 39% rate appears aimed at its high-value pharmaceutical and manufacturing exports. The broad application of these duties suggests a targeted effort to pressure specific industries and recalibrate trade balances on a country-by-country basis. The incomplete note that “small deficit nations have a…” suggests a potential, albeit unspecified, leniency for certain countries, echoing a preference for bilateral negotiations over multilateral frameworks.
Economic Ripples: Supply Chains and Inflation Pressures
These tariffs are not abstract policy points; they stand to reshape supply chains in real time. The high rates on Laos and Myanmar could accelerate a pivot towards other low-cost producers, but with Vietnam and Indonesia also targeted, companies might look inward or to allies like India, which faces its own scrutiny. Investors in multinationals should watch for margin squeezes, as firms absorb costs or pass them on, potentially fuelling US inflation.
Consider the Canadian angle: a 35% tariff could spike costs for US consumers on everything from maple syrup to aluminium. Historical data from the US Trade Representative’s office shows Canada ran a $50 billion goods surplus with the US last year, providing ammunition for tariff advocates. Yet, this might backfire, as integrated industries like automotive manufacturing span the border, risking job losses on both sides.
In Asia, the 40% tariff on Laos and Myanmar targets nations with burgeoning export sectors but limited leverage. Myanmar’s garment industry, which exported over $2 billion to the US in 2024, could see factories shutter. Laos might find alternative markets in China, but at lower margins. This could inadvertently boost competitors, creating opportunities for investors in unaffected regions—it is as if the administration is playing global whack-a-mole with trade deficits.
Geopolitical Undertones
Beyond economics, these tariffs carry a strategic edge. Taiwan’s 20% rate arrives amid heightened US support for the island, potentially accelerating domestic US chip production. Israel’s 15% tariff, while seemingly light, underscores tensions over trade balances in defence technology, where US aid often flows the other way.
Venezuela’s inclusion at 15% blends trade with sanctions history, potentially pushing US oil refiners towards other sources. Turkey and South Korea, both allies, face the same rate, which might strain alliances. South Korea’s $30 billion trade surplus with the US in 2024 provides context, but the tariff could prompt retaliatory measures.
Investor Implications: Risks and Opportunities
For portfolios, this tariff volley spells volatility. Equity markets may wobble as affected sectors—such as consumer goods, technology hardware, and commodities—reprice risks. Analysis suggests these levies could equate to a substantial annual tax hike per US household, dampening consumer spending and corporate earnings.
Forecasts vary: some economic models estimate a drag on US GDP growth in 2026 if tariffs persist, while boosting domestic manufacturing in targeted sectors. Company outlooks from firms reliant on Taiwanese components hint at supply chain diversification costs in the billions.
- Sectors to watch: Semiconductors (Taiwan exposure) could see short-term dips but long-term US gains.
- Commodities: Canadian tariffs might lift prices for lumber and metals, benefiting US producers.
- Emerging markets: Funds heavy in Southeast Asia face headwinds.
- Opportunities: Tariff-proof plays like domestic energy or technology reshoring stocks could benefit.
Professional sentiment leans cautious. Many see this as bluster ahead of negotiations, but with real deadlines looming. If small-deficit nations indeed get a pass, as implied, it could carve out safe havens for selective emerging market investments.
Looking Ahead: Negotiation or Escalation?
The playbook is familiar: tariffs as a cudgel to force concessions. Some countries, such as certain EU members, have reportedly secured partial relief through deals, suggesting this list might evolve. For Canada, urgent talks could yield a USMCA tweak; Switzerland’s high tariff might prompt pharmaceutical pacts.
Yet, escalation risks loom. If smaller nations retaliate, it could fragment regional trade. Broader forecasts warn of a potential haircut to global growth if tariffs broaden, with emerging Asia bearing the brunt.
In sum, these tariffs underscore a protectionist pivot that prioritises US leverage over global harmony. Investors would do well to monitor deal-making progress; what starts as a breaking announcement could end in revalued alliances or entrenched trade barriers. The overarching signal is clear: America’s trade reset is underway, for better or for worse.
***
### References
Associated Press. (2025, July). Trump’s ‘list’: Unsolicited letters threaten new tariffs on dozens of countries. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-countries-letters-166230b4fa2be33ece1825322b34ff6a
Gavin, G. [@gurgavin]. (2025, July 14). [Post detailing proposed tariff rates for various countries]. X. https://x.com/gurgavin/status/1909818575168405572
Gramer, R., & Detsch, J. (2025, July 30). Trump’s Trade Deadline Puts Alliances on the Brink. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/07/30/trump-tariffs-trade-deals-august-1-deadline/
Le Monde. (2025, July 31). Trump announces new tariffs as deadline nears. Le Monde.fr. https://lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2025/07/31/trump-announces-new-tariffs-as-deadline-nears_6743931_19.html
Reuters. (2025, July 28). Trump eyes world tariff of 15-20% for most countries. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/trump-eyes-world-tariff-15-20-most-countries-2025-07-28/
Sidhant Sibal. [@sidhant]. (2025, July 12). [Post discussing US-India trade talks and potential tariffs]. X. https://x.com/sidhant/status/1907641939064697027
Sorkin, A. R., et al. (2025, July 28). Trump’s Tariff Tracker. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/07/28/business/economy/trump-tariff-tracker.html
Spectator Index [@spectatorindex]. (2025, August 1). [Post listing countries facing new US tariffs]. X. https://x.com/spectatorindex/status/1943036572628365809
Tax Foundation. (2025). The Economic and Household Impact of the Trump Tariffs. Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/trump-tariffs-trade-war/
The New York Times. (2025, July 31). Trump Live Updates: Tariff Threats Roil Global Markets as Deadline Passes. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/07/31/us/trump-news
TIME. (2025, July 28). How Trump’s New Trade Deals Could Reshape the World. TIME. https://time.com/7300389/trump-trade-deals-tariff-letters-deadline/
Timiraos, N. [@NickTimiraos]. (2025, July 12). [Post discussing the potential economic impact of widespread tariffs]. X. https://x.com/NickTimiraos/status/1907537294900474100
Trade Compliance Resource Hub. (2025, July 14). Trump 2.0 Tariff Tracker. Trade Compliance Resource Hub. https://www.tradecomplianceresourcehub.com/2025/07/14/trump-2-0-tariff-tracker/
Trade Compliance Resource Hub. (2025, July 28). Trump 2.0 Tariff Tracker (Updated). Trade Compliance Resource Hub. https://www.tradecomplianceresourcehub.com/2025/07/28/trump-2-0-tariff-tracker/
Vibhor, N. [@nakulvibhor]. (2025, August 1). [Post detailing proposed tariff rates]. X. https://x.com/nakulvibhor/status/1942403262881443927
